1.
What was easy for me in planning the lesson? Why?
Choosing the
actual lesson, reading The Very Hungry Caterpillar, was pretty easy for me to
decide as it is one of my son’s favorite books and it is also such a
well-known story. It offers a chance to teach children about the days of the
week, numbers, and even to take a look at the life cycles of a caterpillar.
Writing about
the standards that were going to be covered by the lesson plan were easy too,
because all of those were based on research of what the standards in my state
are. I was able to quickly pinpoint the areas that are expected to learn for
this age group that could and would be incorporated.
|
2.
What components were difficult for me to complete when planning the
lesson? Why?
Practice and
checking for understanding was a bit more difficult for me because I don’t
think I was able to come up with any creative ways to “test” for knowledge
gain without just simply asking questions. I feel that I could have done more
to involve parents into the practice and checking for understanding by
sending home a simple activity sheet that parents can go over with their children to keep the fun
going.
|
3.
What do I want to improve on when creating lesson plans?
I want to
improve on time management. I need better time management when creating a
lesson plan as well as managing the time it would take each day to do the
activities that are in the lesson plan. I also think I could benefit greatly
by working on more creative ways to put into practice things that have been
learned from the activities. If I were to do it again, I would also figure
out a way to have families more involved with the activities or the plan
itself so they can continue with the fun and learning at home.
|
4.
How will this assignment help me in my future role?
Simply, just
knowing the basic components of creating a lesson plan is extremely
beneficial. Knowing that there is basically a list of expectations for the
age group being taught, you can base your plan on that by thinking of a
creative way to teach it.
|
Evaluation
of Peer’s Lesson Plan: Edith Altizer
Strengths
& Areas of Reflection: I am
excited that this lesson plan is based around reading, because I’ve learned
that reading aloud to children is probably the best way to help them to
acquire language and language skills. I do not know what age group this
lesson plan is for, however. I feel there could have been a more creative way
to go about practice and checking for understanding. The closing was quite
vague, but all in all I think it was a good “base” plan that a teacher could
use and possibly add to for almost any type of lesson plan or activity.
|
Evaluation
of Peer’s Lesson Plan: Andra Allen
Strengths
and Areas of Reflection: A major
strength is that her lesson plan clearly states that it is to help children
acquire a second language. I think that by having her lesson plan not be
specific (i.e. which books to use) leaves a lot of room for creativity and
being able to switch things up a bit to meet the needs of other activities
and lesson.
|
Evaluation
of Peer’s Lesson Plan: Quicia Hoke
Strengths
Areas of Reflection: Right off I
noticed the mention of adding sensory play into the lesson plan. Playing is
very important for learning and not many other lesson plans mentioned
“playing” of any kind too much, mine included. I had crafts and something
that can be ongoing after the lesson has finished. The only problem I see
with this lesson is that some parents may be uncomfortable with their sons
playing with dolls. (I personally do not think anything would be wrong with
my son playing with dolls, but I know parents who would.) I really enjoyed
that she talked about how she would change things around for children with
special needs and that she was aware of possible time changes because not all
children are the same.
|
A Teaching Mommy
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Practice and Reflection
Monday, September 16, 2013
Current Issues Critical Thinking
Week 3
Journal
Jennifer Strope
September 16, 2013
Jennifer Strope
September 16, 2013
I could not in good conscience just write on one
small snippet of information from a very long document. I’m not going to say I
read every last word but I skimmed over the general stuff, read deeply into the
more specific stuff and paused especially at the author(s) comparisons between
their lives as Digital Immigrants and those of Digital Natives (the children
born into immersive technology). My first thought on the selected statement
from the document is “Yes, Right on!” Children are learning differently,
expressing themselves in ways that confound adults and push the boundaries of
what we expect and assume. My second thought though is; has not every
generation in its own way been fundamentally different than the generation
before them? I submit that if we were convinced that we were only looking at a
recent radically fundamental change in this new generation that we would be
blind to the truth. Where did this immersive technology that they were born into
come from? My husband was born while the house he grew up in was being built.
He did not build it though his father did. The previous generation creates the
world the new generation is born into. So this fundamentally different way of
thinking already existed BEFORE the generation of digital natives ever rose up.
I think what we are seeing is what has been going on since the dawn of time. In
the cycle of intellectual advancement we begin with the current established
generation who is pretty content with how things are. From that generation
comes the few that fundamentally think differently, your Thomas Edison’s, your
Nikola Tesla’s, your Albert Einstein’s, and your Steven Jobs. As a side note
Apple’s newest slogan is simply Think Different. The point is it is from these
pioneers that things like electricity becomes commonplace, then commonplace in
our homes till it is just something to the new generation that was always
there. Every fundamentally different change eventually becomes part of normalcy
for the next generation. I don’t think we are looking at anything all that
spectacular or that has not or will not happen again. Out of this digital
natives mark my words will come a tiny group of pioneers into the next
fundamentally different way of thinking for the generation that follows them.
Now that I have gone way overboard on the first
question, let’s try and get through the remaining ones. I have to believe that
every generation learns differently than the past one; the advances in
medicine, science, and technology are testaments to those differences. But the
ground work for those differences as I mentioned are laid by the pioneers who
came from the previous generation. As for how this affects my future role as an
educator and what implications it will have, I don’t think it will have that
drastic an effect as one would think. I say that because I feel that by nature
of me wanting to be a better teacher I am going to use the technology that I
have become comfortable with, bringing that into my teaching, allowing students
to absorb my experiences and enjoyment I already get from using technology in
my daily life. I think what the great
educators of the past present and future all have in common is the balance
between sharing honestly with the next generation what they do know, and being
open and receptive to having what they do know challenged and even overthrown
without taking it personally. Without this balance we would still believe the
world is flat, have no idea that microscopic things called germs make people
sick, have no nuclear energy, the list is endless. So the only implication for
me would be letting my pride in what I know blind me or prevent me from getting
a glimpse of the future.
Monday, September 2, 2013
Rapid Fire Reaction - Wk1Dq1
Jennifer Strope
Week 1 Journal
ECE 315: Language Development in Young Children
Week 1 Journal
ECE 315: Language Development in Young Children
Today’s journal prompt reminded me of myspace “QUIZZES” I
used to like to fill out years and years ago, so I thought it would be fun to
approach it in that manner and pretend I’m 19 again.
Think about your day today.
- How
did you communicate? Today
I spent most of my day communicating with spoken words while speaking
one-on-one in person with people. Today is Labor Day so we had a family
meal with my in-laws including my brother-in-law Kirk and his fiancé Elle,
a good friend of the family Karol and her 2 boys. I also communicated with
my son by giving him high fives, hugs, and kisses. Sometimes it’s not
about what you say. I’ve posted pictures from our day onto Instagram, too.
I love communicating with photos. Right now I am communicating in this
journal by typing, though I don’t have an audience while I’m typing it, I
will, eventually. I am also “chatting” online with Elle about our love for
music. She’s a fan of 80s, while I’m a 90’s girl at heart. I also shared a
music video on Facebook, along with status updates throughout the day. I
live far away from my family and most of my friends, so I use Facebook,
Twitter, and Instagram to communicate.
- Is
this different than how you communicated 10 years ago? I communicated pretty much the same way 10 years ago,
however, I spent much more time face-to-face with my family and friends.
And I was on Myspace rather than Facebook. I had only been a high school
graduate for about a year, which I took off from school. I spent a lot of
time on my cellphone and landline phone when I wasn’t face-to-face.
- How
about 20 years ago? 20
years ago I was almost 9 years old.
You could not have paid me money to get off of the phone, now you
can’t pay me to get on one! I did not even know what the internet was, and
I communicated by playing with other kids. I lived next door to my cousin
and bff Bev then, and we were inseparable. We wrote a lot of notes at that
age, too. That is something I never do now. I kind of miss writing letters
on paper.
- Our
language and our means of communication have changed over time. I am happy that it’s so easy to communicate through
texts, internet, video chat etc because my family isn’t here with me. I
think it’s interesting how new words have actually been acquired. When I
was younger I knew all the cool slang. Now, I read something online or hear
a kid talking I am lost as to what they mean. It makes me feel old.
- Have
our rules and theories also changed?
I’ve noticed that there are a
lot more “bad” words being said on TV and in movies now. I also have
noticed that the media is more “okay” with communicating sexual things on
tv too. Perfect example the “performance” Miley Cyrus gave at the VMAs
last week. I don’t ever see that being allowed on TV when I was 9 years
old. I still have nightmares.
- What
about our interactions and expectations? Our interactions have become more impersonal, I think.
Even when email became a more common thing, we wrote out longer emails.
Then IMs came along and then text messages, and our messages just get
shorter and a lot less personal. Our expectations are almost the same. We
don’t want long and drawn out responses, and we want responses almost
instantly. If we don’t get immediate responses we start to think something
is wrong. Everything is so face paced now.
- How
about the effectiveness of our communication? I think we are able to convey messages and ideas much
more quickly now than we could before. Different cultures and languages
are more able to understand due to such quick ways of communicating and
translating. For example, whenever any type of terror occurs around the
world, there are always people able to communicate and translate so that
everyone is able to read and react. On the other hand, the emotional
effectiveness of communication has gone down. For instance, sarcasm is
very difficult to pick out in an electronic message unless you know that
person well and their mannerisms, however, it can be very easy to pick out
when face to face or even on the phone.
- How
do you think the new forms of language and abundance of diverse
communication methods will affect our children and youth? Our children, due to all this interconnection of
internet and news, etc., are going to be much more globally aware.
However, we may witness a generation of sensory overload, which may cause
them to be unable to care. Does that make sense? If you see all the bad in
the world, how can you choose what bad to care most about? They will be
soaking up a lot of information, but will they have time to really apply
it?
- What
is the impact of this new communication on the “old” forms of
communication? Like I said before, I miss
handwriting letters. I felt it took a lot of time, especially when I
learned how to type so quickly, but now I really miss it. Typing out a
Facebook comment on a person’s page isn’t the same as taking the time (and
wasting pages of paper to get your handwriting perfect) to form a letter. Another
difference is how businesses are now letting people go more “green” by
paying bills online electronically. There is a lot less mail going out
now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)